It was an isolation played out in public, however, and so Lahr’s book has more the quality of picaresque epic than of solitary portrait. The dialogue continued to the nearly exhausted outer limit where it became an echoing chamber theater of isolation. Whatever his circumstances he never stopped turning himself inside out, fashioning voices to articulate what he found there. Its traces are scattered profusely in diaries, letters, memoirs, prefaces, newspaper articles, and interviews, and in the plays, poems, stories, and screenplays in which Williams never stopped exploring new frames within which to give shape and meaning to his life even as it appeared to be dissolving. That voice dominates Lahr’s exuberantly detailed and constantly engaging account: a voice of unabashed truth-telling, frequently hilarious interjections, and a sense of musicality that did not fail him. The tone of the phrase alone-it comes from a 1937 diary entry-with its hint of what may now seem self-consciously overripe eloquence, its elusive mix of ironic gaudiness and open-hearted romanticism, already suggests a voice from a past more remote than could ever, to those of us who lived through Tennessee Williams’s era, have seemed possible. Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh: John Lahr’s subtitle for his biography of Tennessee Williams nimbly fuses madness, spiritual quest, and sexuality in one inextricable formulation. Tennessee Williams and Marlon Brando, 1948
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |